Comparison

ShipPost vs EasyGen for LinkedIn posts

EasyGen optimises for LinkedIn engagement. ShipPost optimises for sounding like a developer who actually ships. Different goals, different tools.

The honest take

EasyGen has a specific pitch: it learns from the "top 1% of LinkedIn creators" and uses trending data to generate posts that perform well with the LinkedIn algorithm. If engagement metrics are your primary goal — likes, comments, impressions — that's a reasonable approach. It's built for people who think in terms of content performance.

The tension for developers is that what performs well on LinkedIn generically and what resonates with a technical audience are often different things. The "top 1% LinkedIn creators" that EasyGen learns from are mostly marketers, coaches, and founders. Their style — motivational openers, list-based structures, engagement-bait closers — doesn't map well to "I shipped a new caching layer and here's what I learned."

ShipPost doesn't optimise for the LinkedIn algorithm. It optimises for making your posts sound like a human developer wrote them. The content comes from your actual work (PRs and URLs), not from trending topics or creator patterns. If you'd rather have a post that your colleagues respect than one that gets 50 likes from people you've never met, that's the trade-off.

Feature comparison

Side by side

Feature ShipPost EasyGen
Built for Developers who ship LinkedIn growth seekers
Optimised for Human-sounding developer content LinkedIn algorithm performance
Voice source Editable system prompts Top LinkedIn creator patterns
Content source GitHub PRs and URLs AI generation, voice notes, repurposing
GitHub integration Built-in PR scanning None
Pricing Free (bring your own API key) Free trial + paid plans
AI model Claude (Anthropic) Proprietary (GPT-based)
Tone control Full prompt editing Style presets from creators
Platform support LinkedIn + X LinkedIn
Draft management Post history with favourites Built-in draft system

Same achievement, different philosophy

See the difference

The scenario

Developer shipped a migration from REST to GraphQL

EasyGen-style output (engagement-optimised)

I made a decision that scared my entire team.

We migrated our entire API from REST to GraphQL.

Here's what happened next:

1. Our frontend team shipped features 40% faster.
2. We eliminated 15 redundant endpoints.
3. Our API documentation writes itself now.

The lesson? Sometimes the scariest decisions lead to the best outcomes.

What's a bold technical decision you've made recently?

ShipPost output

Migrated our main API from REST to GraphQL over the last three weeks. 15 endpoints consolidated into a single graph. The frontend team is happier — they can query exactly what they need instead of over-fetching from 3 endpoints to render a dashboard.

Biggest surprise: the migration itself was less painful than expected. We ran both in parallel for a week, diffed the responses, and cut over once they matched. The resolver layer is almost 1:1 with our old controllers.

Total effort was about 3 engineer-weeks, and most of that was writing tests for the new resolvers.

When to use what

Use ShipPost when...

  • You're a developer posting about technical work
  • You want posts that sound genuine, not optimised
  • You need GitHub PR integration
  • You want full control over AI prompts
  • You prefer free with pay-per-use costs

Use EasyGen when...

  • LinkedIn engagement metrics are your primary goal
  • You want to write like top LinkedIn creators
  • You need voice notes and content repurposing
  • You want built-in draft management
  • You're optimising for algorithm performance

Related reading

FAQ

Common questions

Is EasyGen good for developer content? +

EasyGen is optimised for general LinkedIn content performance. Its training data comes from top LinkedIn creators — mostly marketers and coaches, not developers. If you want posts that resonate with a technical audience specifically, a developer-focused tool like ShipPost will produce more relevant output.

Does EasyGen integrate with GitHub? +

No. EasyGen generates content from AI suggestions, voice notes, and content repurposing. It doesn't connect to GitHub or understand PRs, commits, or code context.

Which tool sounds more human? +

It depends on your definition. EasyGen sounds like a polished LinkedIn creator. ShipPost sounds like a developer talking about their work. If 'human' means 'like the people I work with,' ShipPost is closer for most engineers.

Can I try both for free? +

ShipPost is permanently free — you bring your own API key. EasyGen offers a free trial with limited features before requiring a paid plan.

Ship posts, not content strategies

Generate posts from your actual work, not from trending creator patterns. Free — bring your own API key.

Get started free

No credit card. No subscription. Your keys, your data.